What is the Social Housing Allocation Scheme?

    Every council must, by law, have a written Allocation Scheme that explains how it decides who qualifies for social housing (the Housing Register), how applications are prioritised, and how properties are allocated. The scheme must be reviewed every five years to ensure it remains up to date and fair. Harrow’s current Social Housing Allocation Scheme was last fully reviewed and approved by Cabinet in January 2021. This consultation forms part of the next scheduled review.

    Why is the Council reviewing the policy now?

    Harrow faces significant housing pressures:

    • 2,175 households are currently on the Housing Register
    •  Around 160 council homes and 130 housing association homes become available each year
    • Current lettings meet only 13 per cent of total demand
    • 57 per cent of all lettings are for one-bedroom or studio accommodation
    • The average wait for a three-bedroom property is around 20 years. There are only 12 five-bedroom and 2 six-bedroom council homes in Harrow
    • The last five-bedroom property was let in April 2018; the last six-bedroom in April 2014.

    Because demand far exceeds supply, the review will ensure the scheme reflects Harrow’s housing pressures, makes best use of limited homes, and remains fair, transparent, and effective.

    Who is given priority for social housing?

    By law, councils must give 'reasonable preference' to the following groups when allocating social housing:

    • Households living in overcrowded or unsanitary conditions
    • Those needing to move due to a medical condition or disability
    • Those needing to move for health or welfare reasons, including care leavers and those with high-level support needs
    • Households needing to move due to hardship
    • People who are homeless or at risk of homelessness

    Residency criteria must not be applied to: UK Armed Forces veterans, survivors of domestic abuse, and care leavers.

    What are the main proposed changes to the scheme?

    The review proposes six main changes:

    1. Reduce priority bands from 5 to 4
    2. Increase direct offers (up to 50 per cent) for urgent or strategic cases
    3. Clarify the continuous five-year residence rule
    4. Revise the bedroom size policy
    5. Review the approach to refusals
    6. Define ‘Exceptional Circumstances’ more clearly in the scheme

     Each of these is explained in more detail in the FAQs below.

    What does reducing the number of priority bands mean?

    Harrow currently has five priority bands (A+, A, B, C-, C), which group applicants according to housing need. Over time, this has become complex and congested. The proposed four-band system will simplify the register and prioritise those in greatest need. The new structure will group applicants into Band 1 (urgent need), Band 2 (homelessness/welfare need), Band 3 (non-statutory homeless or insecure housing), and Band 4 (less than five years’ residency or discharged homelessness duty).

     

    Current and proposed bandings in full:

     

    Current Banding Structure


    Band

    Approx. % of Applicants

    Description

    A+

    4%

    Life-threatening medical need, emergency management transfer, enabling fostering/adoption, non-statutory succession, under-occupiers

    A

    16%

    Severe social hardship, severe medical/disability grounds (non-life-threatening), category 1 hazards, care-leaver or supported-housing move-on quotas, council interest transfers, severe overcrowding (council or RP tenants), urgent move to sheltered housing

    B

    4%

    Older people approved for sheltered accommodation with a need to move

    C

    50%

    Homeless households owed a duty (S195, S189B, S193), older people approved for sheltered accommodation but not living in Harrow, severe overcrowding in private rented sector

    C-

    27%

    Reasonable preference but less than five years’ Harrow residency

     

    Proposed New Banding Structure

    Band

    Approx. % of Applicants

    Description

    1

    18%

    Urgent medical need, under-occupiers, leaving supported housing, young people leaving care

    2

    55%

    Homelessness duty owed, non-emergency management transfers, overcrowded households, hardship/welfare moves

    3

    2%

    Homeless households without statutory duty (e.g. non-priority), households facing insecurity or exclusion

    4

    27%

    Households without 5-year continuous residency; homeless households rehoused privately after Section 193 duty discharged (priority retained for 2–5 years depending on bedroom need)

     

    Examples of the changes:

    Current Policy Banding

    Revised Policy Banding

    Existing council tenants releasing a high-demand property

    Band A → Band 2

    Households with a homelessness duty (S195, S189B, S193)

    Band C → Band 2

    Homeless households without statutory duty

    Band C → Band 3

    Older people approved for sheltered accommodation

    Band B → Band 1

    ‘Right to Move’ applicants

    Not in policy → Band 3

    Insecurity that risks homelessness

    Not in policy → Band 3

    Homeless households rehoused privately (retain priority 2–5 yrs)

    Band C / C– → Band 4

    Older people approved for sheltered accommodation but not in Harrow

    Band C → No longer qualifying

     

    What are “Direct Offers” and why might there be more of them?

    Normally, social housing is allocated through Choice-Based Lettings, where applicants bid for properties.
    The proposal allows up to 50 per cent of homes to be offered directly (without bidding) for:

    • Urgent medical, welfare, or safety needs
    • Strategic or operational reasons (e.g., decants, emergencies, safeguarding cases)
    • Financial efficiency, reducing use of costly temporary accommodation

    This flexibility would speed up allocations for households in critical need.

    What is the five-year continuous residence rule, and what might change?

    At present, applicants must have lived continuously in Harrow for at least five years to qualify for the Housing Register. 

    The council is reviewing whether this rule should be increased, reduced or remain at five years to balance fairness, local connection, and housing demand.

    Data from the housing register was analysed to identify which groups might be affected if the residency rule were extended to ten years:

      Key Findings:

    • Around 17 per cent of current applicants would be affected by an increase from five to ten years.
    • The analysis examined potential impacts by ethnicity and age group.

    Impact by ethnicity:

    • White Other: 7 per cent of applicants with ten or more years of residence, compared with 11 per cent with five to nine years. This group is likely to be most adversely affected.  
    • White British: 14 per cent (ten or more years) compared with 10 per cent (five to nine years), likely to benefit most.
    • Black African and Asian Other: largest overall cohorts, showing no significant positive or negative impact.

     Impact by age group:

    • Under 45s: 54 per cent (five to nine years) versus 47 per cent (ten or more years) – most negatively affected.
    • Ages 45–49: 12 per cent (five to nine years) versus 14 per cent (ten or more years) – likely to benefit.
    • Ages 65+: 9 per cent (five to nine years) versus 11 per cent (ten or more years) – likely to benefit.

    Overall, 17 per cent of the register would be affected if the rule were increased to ten years. The White Other and under-45 groups would experience the greatest disadvantage, while the White British and older age groups would likely benefit.

    What changes are proposed to the bedroom size policy?

    The proposal updates how bedrooms are allocated based on household make-up:

    • Adults aged 18 and over will be treated as non-dependants (previously 21+)
    • This brings Harrow in line with national homelessness guidance (Part 7 of the Housing Act)
    • It also addresses fairness where adult children live at home and occupy rooms that could otherwise be reallocated

    This change ensures consistency between housing and homelessness assessments.

    Why are you proposing changes to the approach to refusals?

    Demand for social housing is very high, but some households are refusing reasonable offers. To reduce delays and ensure fair use of limited housing stock, the council proposes that if a reasonable offer is refused, the household will be suspended from the Housing Register for 12 months. This aims to encourage applicants to engage seriously with suitable offers, speed up allocations, and reduce reliance on temporary accommodation.

    What are “Exceptional Circumstances”?

    Some applicants may have urgent or unique situations not covered by standard policy rules.

    The council plans to clearly define an ‘Exceptional Circumstances’ process in the revised scheme to make decisions fairer and more transparent.

    This will ensure that any exceptions are applied consistently and only where genuinely necessary.

    What happens after the consultation closes?

    The consultation will run for seven weeks (from Monday 13 October to Monday 1 December).

     All feedback will be reviewed and used to inform the final version of the scheme, which will then be presented to Cabinet for approval.

    Once approved, the new Allocation Scheme will replace the current 2021 version.